AL HIDAYA 2009 The Massenger of Mercy Sitting 04
Read Complete Book on Women Rights by Dr.Tahir ul Qadri
http://www.minhajbooks.com/urdu/bookid/288/اسلام-میں-خواتین-کے-حقوق.
AL HIDAYA 2009 The Massenger of Mercy Sitting 04
Read Complete Book on Women Rights by Dr.Tahir ul Qadri
http://www.minhajbooks.com/urdu/bookid/288/اسلام-میں-خواتین-کے-حقوق.
COVENTRY, England (Reuters) – Like any rousing Islamic preacher, Muhammed Tahir ul-Qadri’s voice rises to a shout and his index finger jabs as he hammers home a point.
But rather than angry calls for jihad (holy war) or a vitriolic denunciation of the West and its aggressions against Islam, Qadri’s message, equally forcefully delivered, is about moderation, peace, inclusion and understanding.
Addressing a packed auditorium from a raised platform, his words beamed on to large screen behind him, more than 1,000 young followers hang on his every word, even as his lecture moves into its fourth uninterrupted hour.
“Islam is not a religion of seclusion, it is not a religion of detachment,” he thunders from the dais, occasionally pausing to wipe the sweat from his brow or adjust his spectacles.
“Any killer of a non-Muslim citizen, he will go to hell. Those who are committing terroristic acts from Pakistan and Afghanistan and claiming it is jihad — they do not know what jihad is. It is forbidden. There will not be janna (paradise) for them,” he hollers, to shouts of approval from his listeners.

Qadri, 58, who was born in Pakistan but now lives in Canada, is a renowned scholar of Sufism, a long tradition within Islam that focuses on spirituality, emphasizing peace and moderation.
The author of more than 400 books on Islamic scholarship and law, Qadri travels the world delivering sermons to Sufis, while his organization, called Minhaj ul-Quran, has spread to 80 countries, from Greece to Fiji, since its founding in 1981.
In Britain, he is the main draw at a three-day retreat for young Muslims called “Al Hidayah” (Guidance), which over the past five years has grown into the biggest spiritual camp of its kind, with more than 1,200 attendees from a dozen countries.
Qadri believes camps like his, which attract teenagers — girls and boys wearing traditional dress who sit separately in the auditorium — as well as their parents and children as young as six, can play a part in combating extremism within Islam.
For Britain, that has been particularly important since 2003, when the country joined the invasion of Iraq, and 2005, when four young British Muslims carried out suicide bombings on the London transport network, killing 52 people.
“I feel it is my duty to save the younger generation from radicalization,” Qadri said quietly over lunch on Sunday, shortly after finishing the second of several lectures and question-and-answer sessions, which concluded on Monday.
“We need to prepare them mentally and academically, intellectually and spiritually, against extremist tendencies and radical and terrorist attitudes. We need to provide them with an awakening of the true picture of Islam,” he said.
TACKLING EXTREMISM
Around the world, and particularly in the United States, there has been a steady increase in adherence to Sufism in the past decade. Governments keen to tackle the spread of more radical branches of Islam in their countries have worked with Sufi scholars and tried to emphasize their teachings.
In Britain, home to around 1.7 million Muslims, the bulk from Pakistan, the government at first worked to promote Sufism, supporting the creation in 2006 of the Sufi Muslim Council, a group that took a strong stand against Islamist extremism.
But since then, it has moved away from explicit support, saying that working via the Sufi community — whose exact number in Britain is not known — is just one element of a wider approach to countering Islamic radicalism.
“It’s part of a broader engagement. We don’t want to isolate any one group over another,” a government spokeswoman said.
Supporters of Qadri, though, are adamant about the benefits of his teachings, with students coming from as far as Denmark and Canada to hear him speak during the three-day retreat. Women in particular like his emphasis on female equality within Islam, an element not always touched on by other Islamic scholars.
“What he says is mind-opening, it makes you feel good as a woman,” said Sofia Saeed, 27, a legal assistant who traveled from Manchester to attend the retreat with a friend.
“There’s no discrimination here. It makes you feel like a stronger believer, a stronger person,” she said, comfortably mixing designer sunglasses with her full hijab head covering.
Qadri, a former minister in Pakistan and close associate of Benazir Bhutto, the assassinated former prime minister, does not believe his teachings can change radical minds overnight, but he is a believer that intellect can ultimately defeat extremism.
“If the terrorists are 10 people and the peaceful are 1,000, then they are more powerful than us with their arms, even if we are 5,000,” he said. “But the point is that we have to make the 5,000 more powerful not with arms, but by the communication of the right message of Islam.”
(Reporting by Luke Baker; Editing by Jon Boyle)
This article is taken from http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE5792AL20090810?sp=true
Yahoo News
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
euronews
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
Stv
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
Global Tv . Com
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
The Star phoenix
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
Toronto Star
‘Ideas are the best’ weapons: Islamic scholar
Canada.com
Messenger of moderation
Sufischolar seeks to save young Muslims from radicalization
The Brunei Times
UK Muslim camp preaches peace
National Post
Messenger of moderation
National Post
Preacher a voice for moderation
The Gazette
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
The Vancouver Sun
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
The Malaysia Insider
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Islam Online.net
UK Sufi Camp Combats Extremism
Republika Online
Kamp Muslim Inggris Melawan Ekstrimis
Reuters Italia
Gran Bretagna, “campo islamico” contro estremismo seduce giovani
Reuters India
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Birmingham Post
Islamic author denounces terrorism as a cancer in Muslim world
Islam Online
UK Sufi Camp Combats Extremism
National Post
Preacher a voice for moderation
The Province
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
Euro News
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
The Windsor Star
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
IB Times
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
Javno
`Muslim Camp` Draws UK Teens To Combat Extremism
Aussie Muslims
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
The Revival
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism!
NEWS Tin
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
Yanabi . Com
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism…
Digg
‘Muslim Camp’ draws teens to combat extremism
Nicer News
‘Muslim Camp’ draws teens to combat extremism
Topix
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Canada
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
Leader Post
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
Best News
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
World Peace
‘Muslim Camp’ draws teens to combat extremism
ABC News
“Muslim Camp” Draws Teens to Combat Extremism
Euro Islam . Info
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Hizb ut-Tahrir
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
World News
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Toronto Star
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
The Free Library online
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
Daily Times
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Reuters UK
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
Reuters
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
Canada
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
The PEW Forum | Religion News
‘Ideas are the best’ weapons: Islamic scholar
The Siasat
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Bay Ledger News Zone
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
Maryam-blog Blogspot
‘MUSLIM CAMP’ DRAWS UK TEENS TO COMBAT EXTREMISM
Talk Islam
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism.
Times of Malta
Without attacks, Qaeda’s roars ring hollow
Mohammed Tahir ul-Qadri is on the phone, talking about war, but he is not referring to guns.
“I don’t know how to use a pistol,” admits the Pakistani-born Islamic scholar, who is in Birmingham, England, at the moment, though he spends roughly 10 months a year in Canada, his adopted home for the past several years. “If you put a pistol in my hand, I wouldn’t know how to use it.”
The 58-year-old spiritual leader does know how to use words and ideas, however, and he is recruiting them both in the cause of peace.
“I have, you can say, announced an intellectual and spiritual war against extremism and terrorism. I believe this is the time to stand up for moderate Islamic scholars who believe in peace.”

Forget for now the lurid images of hatred and bloodshed that have dominated Western perceptions of Islam in recent years, and lend an ear to this voluble, bespectacled Canadian grandfather, who is at the forefront of what some might call a renaissance of moderate Islam, preaching a doctrine of inclusion and tolerance.
“He is definitely a scholar who should be highlighted,” says Asad Dean, a Muslim community organizer in Toronto. “He has a fantastic relationship with all the communities.”
In their struggle for the hearts and minds of the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims, Qadri and other like-minded clerics are squaring off against ruthless organizations, such as the Taliban and Al Qaeda, which present a very different facet of Islam, one that celebrates violence while rejecting any prospect of accommodation with the West.
The welfare, livelihood and dreams of tens of millions of people around the globe depend on which side triumphs in this battle of words and ideas, a battle that is also a contest of military might – in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.
Qadri is far from alone in this fight.
Partly in response to U.S. President Barack Obama’s recent opening to the Muslim world, moderate Islamic clerics in many lands have been emboldened to speak out against those who traffic in the weapons of hate.
“Ideas are the best arms,” Qadri says. “Societies should be armed with better ideas.
“To me, the ideal society in the world is Canadian society,” he says. “We believe in the letter and spirit of multiculturalism.”
Qadri has no patience with violent extremists who claim to represent his faith.
Lately, it is Osama bin Laden and his ilk who have transfixed the attention of the West, but Qadri regards them as exceptions – traitors to Islam – who have achieved an influence out of proportion to their numbers.
In large measure, he holds the news media responsible for presenting a distorted picture of Islam, one that depicts its adherents as fist-waving advocates of hate.
“Millions and millions of Muslim people – more than a billion – are living a peaceful life,” he says, “but their life does not create news.”
Violence, of course, does create news, as do tyranny and intolerance.
“They make women stay in their homes,” he says of Muslim extremists. “They destroy girls’ schools. This is against Islam, totally wrong. This has created a very bad image.”
Qadri, who has served for a time as a member of Pakistan’s National Assembly, has spent years promoting interfaith dialogue, largely through Minhaj-ul-Quran International, a non-governmental organization he founded in 1980 and still heads.
Qadri, who will return to Canada early next month, lives near Hamilton, where he devotes himself to writing about Islam. He says he is determined to change the negative images now associated with his faith, while also stopping radical Islam in its tracks.
It’s a tall order but an urgent one.
“We want a secure future for everybody,” he says. “I speak of the human race.”
This article is taken from http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE5792AL20090810?sp=true
Yahoo News
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
euronews
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
Stv
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
Global Tv . Com
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
The Star phoenix
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
Toronto Star
‘Ideas are the best’ weapons: Islamic scholar
Canada.com
Messenger of moderation
Sufischolar seeks to save young Muslims from radicalization
The Brunei Times
UK Muslim camp preaches peace
National Post
Messenger of moderation
National Post
Preacher a voice for moderation
The Gazette
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
The Vancouver Sun
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
The Malaysia Insider
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Islam Online.net
UK Sufi Camp Combats Extremism
Republika Online
Kamp Muslim Inggris Melawan Ekstrimis
Reuters Italia
Gran Bretagna, “campo islamico” contro estremismo seduce giovani
Reuters India
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Birmingham Post
Islamic author denounces terrorism as a cancer in Muslim world
Islam Online
UK Sufi Camp Combats Extremism
National Post
Preacher a voice for moderation
The Province
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
Euro News
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
The Windsor Star
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
IB Times
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
Javno
`Muslim Camp` Draws UK Teens To Combat Extremism
Aussie Muslims
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
The Revival
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism!
NEWS Tin
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
Yanabi . Com
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism…
Digg
‘Muslim Camp’ draws teens to combat extremism
Nicer News
‘Muslim Camp’ draws teens to combat extremism
Topix
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Canada
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
Leader Post
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
Best News
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
World Peace
‘Muslim Camp’ draws teens to combat extremism
ABC News
“Muslim Camp” Draws Teens to Combat Extremism
Euro Islam . Info
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Hizb ut-Tahrir
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
World News
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Toronto Star
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
The Free Library online
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
Daily Times
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Reuters UK
“Muslim Camp” draws UK teens to combat extremism
Reuters
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
Canada
‘Muslim Camp’ draws U.K. teens to combat extremism
The PEW Forum | Religion News
‘Ideas are the best’ weapons: Islamic scholar
The Siasat
‘Muslim Camp’ draws UK teens to combat extremism
Bay Ledger News Zone
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism
Maryam-blog Blogspot
‘MUSLIM CAMP’ DRAWS UK TEENS TO COMBAT EXTREMISM
Talk Islam
“Muslim Camp” draws teens to combat extremism.
Times of Malta
Without attacks, Qaeda’s roars ring hollow
Words fail to express the feelings of horror and grief one experienced while watching the scenes of mayhem, destruction of homes and the burning of seven people alive on TV channels in the Gojra city of Punjab. What made it all the more poignant was the fact that people, inspired by religious fervour and egged on by the so-called religious clerics having half-baked understanding of Islam, were doing everything our great religion condemned and ordained its followers against. Thus through their actions, these people brought a bad name not only to Pakistan but also Islam. Displaying sheer ignorance of Islamic teachings, they handed down a justification to those elements who are, otherwise, bent on demonizing Islam by invoking such incidents as the representation of what Islam stands for. It is high time we introspected ourselves and went back to the teachings of Islam vis-à-vis minorities.
Islam espouses values of universal brotherhood, tolerance and mutually peaceful coexistence ordaining its followers to be the source of peace for people around them. It aims at the establishment of such an ideal state and society where all citizens, irrespective of their association, religious identity, race, colour and creed, enjoy the similar rights and equality in the eyes of law. The Quranic injunction “There is no coercion in religion” (2:256) negates the element of coercion and oppression in religious matters and forms the basis for protection of rights of minorities. At another place, Allah Almighty says in the Holy Quran: “(So) for you is your religion and for me is my religion” (109:6)
The importance and sanctity of rights Islam gives to minorities can be further gauged by the saying of the Holy Prophet (saw): “Beware! If anyone dared oppress a member of minority community or usurped his right or tortured him more than his endurance or took something away forcibly without his consent, I would fight (against such Muslim) on his behalf on the Day of Judgment.” (Abu Dawood 3:170)
This is not merely a warning but has the sanctity of a law, which was promulgated in the Islamic state during the blessed period of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) but which also continued to be implemented in the later period and is still a part of constitution of Islamic state. The Holy Prophet (PBUH) would always forewarn Muslims about the rights of the minorities. While talking of minorities one day, he said: “Whosoever killed a member of a minority community, he would not smell the fragrance of paradise though fragrance of paradise would cover the distance of forty years.” (Ibne Rushd, Badiya-tul-Mujtahid, 2:299)
Whenever the non-Muslim delegations would come to the Holy Prophet (pubh), he would extend them hospitality himself. Once a Christian delegation from Abyssinia came over to meet the Prophet of Islam (PBUH) in the blessed city of Madina, he took it upon himself to play host to the guests and made them stay in the Prophet’s Mosque. He said: “These people occupy distinguished and privileged status for our companions, therefore, I chose to extend them respect and hospitality myself.” (Ibne Kathir, as-Seertun Nabvia, 2:31)
Likewise, another 14-member Christian delegation from Nijran came to the holy city of Madina. The Holy Prophet (PBUH) made the delegation stay in the Prophet’s Mosque and allowed the Christians of the delegation to worship according to their religion in the Prophet’s Mosque. (Ibne Saad, at-Tabqatul Kubra, 1:357)
Such was the deep and penetrating impact of the Holy Prophet’s good treatment of the minorities that their interaction with him was also based on respect and reverence. When an ally Jew was about to die during a battle, people asked him about the possible heir to his huge property, he said that the Holy Prophet (PBUH) would be guardian of his property. This speaks volumes of the reverence the Prophet of Islam (PBUH) had in the eyes of the non-Muslims.
Imam Abu Yousuf writes in his magnum opus “Kitab-ul-Khiraj” that both Muslims and non-Muslim minorities were treated equally in respect of civil law and law of punishments during the Prophetic period and that of the rightly guided caliphs. Once a Muslim killed a non-Muslim during the period of the Holy Prophet (saw). He ordered the killing of that Muslim by way of Qisas and said: “The protection of rights of non-Muslims is my most important duty.” (Shaafi, al-Masand, 1:343)
In the like manner, the status of a Muslim and a non-Muslim is equal in civil law in an Islamic state. The non-Muslim would also deserve the same punishment which would be meted out to a Muslim in case of committal of crimes. Whether a non-Muslim steals things of a Muslim or otherwise, both would deserve the equal amount of punishment. No discrimination can be allowed in their treatment in the eyes of law.
Contrary to the teachings of Islam and the sayings of the Holy Prophet (saw), our actual conduct is shameful to put it mildly, which is responsible for bringing Islam into disrepute. No sane Muslim can approve and condone such reprehensible acts as witnessed in Gojra. It is a matter of immense concern as to how a small minority of bigoted and radical Mullahs can hold sway over ignorant people and make them dance to their tune without any fear of reprisal from state and its law enforcement agencies.
While the administrative failure to nip evil in the bud may be blamed for the outbreak of riots in the short-run, colossal havoc these happenings caused is a reflection of how extremism has penetrated our attitudes and social behaviours. The state cannot allow this situation to worsen by adopting passive and reactive response. It needs to initiate action to undo the damage it did when it promoted and co-opted a particular religious mindset at the cost of social equilibrium, religious tolerance and sectarian harmony. At a time when we need to reach out to other faiths in a bid to engage them in constructive dialogue aimed at finding solutions to the contemporary problems, such acts prove only counterproductive. In the next article, I would discuss the peculiar nature of rights minorities enjoy in an Islamic state.
By Sahibzada Hussain Mohi-ud-Din Qadri
(This article was published in Daily The Frontier Post on Thursday July 23, 2009)
The need for the reform of United Nations cannot be overemphasized, given the complexity of world geo-political scene and the mess the whole world has got into due to lack of effective oversight of the world body. The Millennium summit of United Nations Organization held in 2000 was a landmark event because it set new goals for the world body to achieve in the realms of world peace and economic uplift. The Millennium Declaration issued at the end of the summit represented the collective will of the member states to work together for achieving peace and ensuring a just economic world order based upon the premise of including poor and third world countries in the economic race.
Unfortunately for the people across continents, the UN underwent one crisis after the other caused mainly by the unipolarity in the global world order. As a result of successive failures of the world body to deal with issues in an even-handed manner, the UN faces the worst crisis of lack of trust and credibility in its ability to rise to the occasions.
There is a widespread feeling among the vast section of humanity that it is in fact a handmaiden of the big powers lacking the capability to enforce its charter and ensure peace in the conflict-ridden world. The disappointed people rightly view its role as that of a helpless institution that has no other option but to fall in line when confronted with the specific agendas of the major countries of the world. Coupled with these issues is the inability of the world body to solve such disputes as Palestine and Kashmir involving Muslims.
This lack of trust has basically originated from the UN’s failure in implementing its resolutions regarding disputes involving Muslims and poor countries of the Third World. In spite of the fact that a score of resolutions lie pending on its agenda, it has been unable to even reiterate its commitment to their justness.
And when it comes to the interest of the powerful countries, it takes no time in doing the needful as is proven by the UN-sanctioned Gulf war against Iraq in 1991-2 and the independence of East Timor.
The big failure of the UN is that it has miserably failed in adjusting itself to the Unipolar World Order. The presence of bipolarity served as a major factor in ensuring the world peace and resultantly the role of UN did not come in for as much questioning as now. The very collapse of USSR should have indicated that the UN would have to be up against grave challenges and huge responsibility awaited it in retaining the trust of all member countries. But it shied away from carving out its role in a new world ruled by new rules of the game.
It is the aftermath of its inactivity that US has been able to coin a new doctrine of unilateralism which constitutes the indictment of the world body. The cherished concept of collective security has been shattered to the core with the penetrating fear.
The mushrooming of the regional blocs for economic and security cooperation should also serve as a curtain-raiser for the UN high-ups. Those integrating themselves in regional groupings have this thought rooted in their mind that the real help would come from the countries of the region because of their mutual stakes and interdependence. This symbolizes the weakening faith of these countries.
In view of the overriding need for the UN to set its house in order, some points are in order which would be helpful in reclaiming the lost ground. Firstly, the UN should review its charter in view of the prevalent world order marked by unipolarity with its attendant problems for the collective security arrangements. The location of its role in the world where different dynamics are at work after the collapse of the communism is of great relevance.
In a bid to restore its lost faith, the UN should decide not to make selective use of force that spells an image of its being a puppet organization. The uniform application of its charter would go a long way in reviving the trust of the member states. It would also restore the UN’s independence in its working.
It is not just the area of security and peace that deserves the attention of the UN. The addressing of issues of global poverty, unemployment and hunger is equally important. The ongoing civil wars and internal strife in the blighted countries of the Third World originate from the presence of the above-mentioned problems when gulf between haves and have-nots reach alarming proportions.
In addition to other factors, the unjust economic system in operation in the world characterized by the dominance of rich countries with no space for developing countries is a major reason behind falling standards of life resulting into civil wars and internal conflicts among the competing classes.
The WTO regime is no doubt an attempt at bridging the gap between developed and the developing countries and offers attractive promises for the much-needed change. But there are vast problems in store for the weak economies if they straightaway sign up with the regime without first setting rules of the game. The UN should devise a strategy to ensure that WTO regime does not become yet another instrument of exploiting the poor countries of the world.
More importantly the UN should bring about reforms in its internal structure. The decision-making process needs to be made more democratized and broad-based with maximum participation of the member countries so that they could own the decisions and the feelings that the decisions are imposed from the above without their participation in the process should be eliminated.
For this purpose, there is a need to make the role of the general assembly more relevant and decisive one. General Assembly of the UN is the representative institution of all member states. In view of this position it should be invested with more powers. Rather it is suggested that the general assembly should serve as a legislature for the UN where UNSC should be responsible to it for all its actions. The UNSC should be bound by the charter to seek mandate from the General Assembly for its decisions in the realm of security and world peace. The discretionary and superior role of UNSC should be reduced to the minimal levels.
There should be no further extension of the veto power of the UNSC. The possession of this power by permanent five members is already against the principles of justice and fair-play. In addition to the supervisory role of the General Assembly, the extension of its membership to some other non-permanent countries would be very helpful in reducing the dominant role of the permanent five.
Lastly the UN should devise strategy in dealing with the post-conflict policing and reconstruction work and there should not be any space for any external power for exploiting the material resources of the said country. The resources should be used for the welfare of the masses of the same country. These steps hold great relevance for the UN in making itself a credible body of the world.
(The writer is a PhD scholar in Economics at the Australian University)
By Dr Rahiq Ahmad Abbasi
Knowledge is one of the important pillars upon which the edifice of Islam is raised. The very fact that the first revelation upon the Holy Prophet (pbuh) contained the commandment about ‘reading’ speaks volumes of the emphasis Islam lays on education. All interpreters of the Holy Qur’an have consensus on this that the first five verses of sura al-Alaq form the beginning of the sending of revelation:
اقْرَأْ بِاسْمِ رَبِّكَ الَّذِي خَلَقَO خَلَقَ الْإِنسَانَ مِنْ عَلَقٍO اقْرَأْ وَرَبُّكَ الْأَكْرَمُO الَّذِي عَلَّمَ بِالْقَلَمِO عَلَّمَ الْإِنسَانَ مَا لَمْ يَعْلَمْO
“(O Beloved!) Read (commencing) with the Name of Allah, Who has created (everything). He created man from a hanging mass (clinging) like a leech (in the mother’s womb). Read and your Lord is Most Generous, Who taught man (reading and writing) by the pen, Who (besides that) taught man (all that) which he did not know.” (al-‘Alaq, 96: 1-5)
The first commandment contained in these verses related to ‘reading’ as a part of process of acquisition of knowledge. In addition to the description of Allah Almighty being the Creator and Sustainer, there the mention was also made of two branches of knowledge ie sociology and creations. While indicating knowledge of biology and morality in the verse number two and three, it was also explained that Islamic concept of knowledge is very vast and when Islam talks of acquisition of knowledge, it embraces all branches of knowledge, both religious and secular, in its fold, which are productive for the mankind. Traditional religious sciences are not exclusively meant here. Many verses of the Holy Qur’an invite man to ponder and meditate over the creation of universe; heavens and earth. This meditation and reflection led to the laying down of the foundation of modern science. History bears witness to the fact that the modern science upon which humanity takes pride today, was not only founded by the Muslims but they were also the ones who determined its rules and regulations and undertook early discoveries and inventions. (Since this is not the main subject of this article here, therefore, those interested in knowing more about it should consult Shaykh-ul-Islam Dr Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri’s two-volume book Muqaddima Sirat-ur-Rasool.)
Following the rise of Islamic civilization for one thousand year, one of the basic reasons underlying the total decline of its civilization is that those basic and clear concepts upon which there was no ambiguity in history were not only obscured but also got polluted. One of these is related to women’s acquisition of knowledge. There is a particular mindset in the contemporary age that opposes women’s learning and education tooth and nail and if it does not oppose it in an outright way, it is in favour of putting such restrictions as make it almost next to impossible for female students to get knowledge.
No disagreement is found on acquisition of knowledge being binding and obligatory. The importance and excellence of knowledge has been highlighted both directly and indirectly at about five hundred places in the Holy Qur’an. Describing the duties of the Prophethood of the Holy Prophet (pbuh), Allah Almighty says:
كَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا فِيكُمْ رَسُولاً مِّنكُمْ يَتْلُو عَلَيْكُمْ آيَاتِنَا وَيُزَكِّيكُمْ وَيُعَلِّمُكُمُ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحِكْمَةَ وَيُعَلِّمُكُم مَّا لَمْ تَكُونُواْ تَعْلَمُونَ O
“Likewise, We have sent to you (Our) Messenger from among yourselves who recites to you Our Revelations and purifies and sanctifies (your hearts and ill-commanding selves) and teaches you the Book and inculcates in you logic and wisdom and enlightens you (on the mysteries of spiritual gnosis and divine truth) which you did not know.” (al-Baqara, 2: 151)
هُوَ الَّذِي بَعَثَ فِي الْأُمِّيِّينَ رَسُولًا مِّنْهُمْ يَتْلُواْ عَلَيْهِمْ آيَاتِهِ وَيُزَكِّيهِمْ وَيُعَلِّمُهُمُ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحِكْمَةَ وَإِن كَانُوا مِن قَبْلُ لَفِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ O
“He is the One Who sent a (Glorious) Messenger (pbuh) among the illiterate people from among themselves who recites to them His Revelations and cleanses and purifies them (outwardly and inwardly) and teaches them the Book and Wisdom. Indeed they were in open error before (his most welcome arrival).” (al-Jumu‘a, 62: 2)
The basic principle of Islamic Sharia is that whenever a commandment is revealed, the masculine form of word is used, but female gender is also included in this commandment. If this principle is rejected then basic pillars of Islam such as prayer, fasting, pilgrimage and alms-due will become null and void for women. So this is a proved fact that though God Almighty and the Holy Prophet (pbuh) used the masculine form of sentence to describe most of the commandments, but women are also bound to act and follow those rules and regulations.
The study of these verses clearly shows that the prophetic responsibilities of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) as his Prophethood included recital of the verses, purgation of self, education of the Book and wisdom and communication of knowledge. Four duties out of five directly talk of knowledge whereas the fifth one, and second in the sequence ie purgation of self, refers to a particular kind of knowledge, which is technically defined as mysticism or sufism. Now if the doors of acquiring knowledge are shut on women or unjustified restrictions are imposed upon their acquisition of knowledge, which religion will they act upon or what kind of contact will they have with the Prophet’s religion because the religion the Holy Prophet (pbuh) brought with him is characterized by knowledge in its entirety.
A number of Prophetic traditions also talk directly about knowledge being obligatory and binding in character. The Holy Prophet (pbuh) said: “Acquisition of knowledge is biding on all Muslims (both men and women without any discrimination)”. (Sunan Ibn Maja)
The Holy Prophet (pbuh) also said at another place: “Acquire knowledge even if you may have to go to China for it. Verily acquisition of knowledge is binding on every Muslim”. (Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr)
He (pbuh) said at another place: “Allah Almighty makes the path to paradise easier for him who walks on it for getting knowledge.” (Sahih Muslim)
Therefore when it becomes clear now that the Holy Qur’an has made acquisition of knowledge obligatory for women in the same way as in case of men, the study of the life of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) also shows that he himself made special arrangements for the education and training of women.
Abu Sa‘id Khudri reports that women said to the Holy Prophet (pbuh): ‘men have gone ahead of us (in terms of acquisition of knowledge). Therefore, appoint a special day for our benefit as well.’ The Holy Prophet (pbuh) fixed one day for them. He (pbuh) would meet them on that day, advise them and educate them about commandments of Allah Almighty. (Sahih Bukhari)
Sayyida ‘A’isha Siddiqa, mother of the faithful, was a hadith-narrator, scholar, intellectual and jurist of great standing. She is believed to have reported 2,210 traditions. Abu Hurayra, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr and Anas ibn Malik were the only ones from amongst male hadith narrators who had narrated more traditions than she did. This shows that women could not only teach women but also men after fulfilling certain preconditions.
‘A’isha bint Talha reports: I stayed with Sayyida ‘A’isha. People from every city would come to me including the old ones (who would put forward questions) because they knew that I am her servant. And the students who were young would treat me like their sister and would present gifts (to Sayyida ‘A’isha through me). Many would also write me letters (so that I could reply them back after soliciting answers from Sayyida ‘A’isha. I would submit: O aunt! Mr. so and so has written a letter and there is his present as well. Sayyida ‘A’isha would say in reply to this: O daughter! Answer his query and give him present in exchange as well. If you have nothing to give, let me know, I will give. So she would return (the present in exchange and I would send it back along with the letter).” (Bukhari, al-Adab al-Mufrad)
Another misunderstanding is found that the girls’ and women’s getting of education from men is forbidden. It is better if there is arrangement of female teacher teaching the female students but in case of any problem or non-availability of female teachers, the act of men teaching female students under condition of veil is not forbidden by the Islamic law or Sharia. Since the Holy Prophet (pbuh) himself made arrangements for education and training of women, therefore, a mention of one day having been specified for women in the Prophet’s Mosque is found. (Sahih Bukhari)
Invoking the commandments of veil, certain people justify their opposition to the female education. Their contention is that since there are men around when women step out of home for education, therefore, it is impossible to observe veil. First of all, this excuse is ridiculous to say the least. If girls or women cannot go out of home for the purpose of education, it is not rightful for them to do the same for any other chore or purpose. In the eyes of such people, the act of women leaving their homes is strictly prohibited. It is another matter that there is no commandment either in Islamic law or history which favours and authenticates this approach. The verse dealing with veil is an authentication of the fact itself that the command of Islamic veil is applicable when one steps out of home. This does not apply in case women stay at their homes. Let us study the relevant verse of veil:
وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا
“And direct the believing women that they (too) must keep their eyes lowered and guard their chastity, and must not show off their adornments and beautification except that (part of it) which becomes visible itself.” (an-Nur, 24: 31)
This verse prohibits the demonstration of beauty. The second thing being said here is that they should cover themselves when they step out of home so that the believing women may be distinguishable from women of other disposition. Addressing the women of the Prophet’s family by way of general education, Allah Almighty said at another place:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ذَلِكَ أَدْنَى أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ غَفُورًا َّحِيمًا O
“O Prophet! Say to your wives, your daughters and the women of believers that (while going out) they should draw their veils as coverings over them. It is more likely that this way they may be recognized (as pious, free women) and may not be hurt (considered by mistake as roving slave girls). And Allah is Most Forgiving, Ever-Merciful.” (al-Ahzab, 33: 59)
Therefore the commandments concerning veil are themselves great justification for women stepping out of their homes. Secondly if the women’s act of stepping out of homes was prohibited, why did the revered wives of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) participate in the battles? Study the following traditions and you would come to know the range of functions women performed during the period of Prophethood.
Anas ibn Malik said: when people got separated from the Holy Prophet (pbuh), I saw ‘A’yesha bint Abi Bakr and Umm Sulaim were completely covered in attire. They would bring water-bags upon their back, offer it to the thirsty Muslims and then return. They would bring water-bags again and made the thirsty Muslims drink it. (Sahih Bukhari)
Umm ‘Atiya says: I participated in seven battles with the Holy Prophet (pbuh). I would pursue the Ghazis in their tracks, cook food for them and do dressing for the injured and make arrangements for treatment of the diseased. (Sahih Muslim)
This practice continued in the period of the rightly-guided Caliphs after the period of Prophethood. For example women used to be part of parliament (majlis shura) during the period of ‘Umar Farooq. (Musannaf ‘Abd ar-Razzaq) During the rule of ‘Uthman, women were designated as ambassadors to other countries. (Tarikh Tabari)
In the similar manner, the history of Islam is replete with the mention of such women who got distinguished positions in such fields as hadith sciences, the science of interpretation, jurisprudence, medical science, poetry and calligraphy. (Shaykh-ul-Islam Dr Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri, Women Rights in Islam)
Therefore, the rationale of putting restrictions on women’s stepping out of their homes is not Islamic in its nature. It could well be a local custom but has nothing to do with Islam.
Let us look at this objection from another angle. Suppose if society is such as makes the fulfillment of conditions of veiling difficult and Islamic veiling is not possible, then a comparative study of two commandments will be undertaken. The commandment concerning veil has come at two places in the Holy Qur’an and the commandment about acquisition of knowledge has come at five hundred places in the Holy Book.
God forbid if conditions are such that women are to make a choice between complete Islamic veiling and acquisition of knowledge, definitely, the choice would pertain to such option about which there are more commandments than others.
Therefore banning the women education under the guise of veil is against Islam and the teachings of the Holy Qur’an and Sunna do not allow it at all. Islam did not differentiate between men and women with regard to obligatory aspect of knowledge. At the end, I want to draw the attention of the scholars and intellectuals to an important problem that acquisition of knowledge is an obligation as established by the Holy Qur’an and the Sunna. All schools of thought also agree to the fact that an outright rejection of an obligation is infidelity. Therefore if anyone considers the women education as prohibited irrespective of whatever justification he may present, he is committing an outright rejection of an obligation. Such type of baseless religious edits, which end up disfiguring the real face of Islam, putting up concocted picture and causing the ridicule of Islamic teachings, should be discouraged. All religious scholars should get their heads together and formulate joint course of action so that such elements, who are bent on defaming Islam for their vested interests, could be reined in.
Two years ago, the world happened to face a controversy caused by the publication of blasphemous and defamatory caricatures of the Holy Prophet (saw), the Holy Qur’an and other sacred rituals of Islam in some European newspapers. Sequel to a strong protest by the world community in general and the Muslim countries in particular, the upheaval temporarily quietened. But it is most unfortunate that the denigrating publications have been restarted. As before, the new wave of nonsense has once again sprouted from Denmark. Not less than eighteen newspapers of a civilized and peaceful country like Denmark have published the heinous caricatures. Furthermore a Holland MP Geert Wilders has produced a fifteen minute film containing indescribably indecent, shameful and demeaning material against the Qur’an and the Holy Messenger of Islam (saw). This new wave of blasphemy which was calmed down by the intervention of peace-loving leaders of the world two years before points to a conspiracy hatched by the evil forces that are engaged in shaking up and destroying the world peace. They desire that the world must plunge into a clash of civilizations.
Considering it our fundamental responsibility we draw attention of the rulers and leaders of all the 257 countries of the world and the Muslim, Christian, Jew and leaders of all other religions to take serious notice of the mischief mongers and their heinous designs to play with sentiments of hundred and fifty million Muslim people on the globe just in the name of freedom of expression. The failure of governments to address this situation has allowed it to spread all over the world, with no end in sight. This situation has been unnecessarily allowed to spiral out of control and has threatened the concept of peaceful co-existence. If not addressed, it can lead to a potential clash of not only civilisations but religions and societies as well. This article aims to put the issue in perspective.
Currently the newspapers involved in blasphemy and other media are trying to justify their profanity in the name of ‘freedom of expression’. Much of this debate has focused on the ‘right of freedom of expression’ with its defenders advocating the sacredness of freedom of speech which needs to be upheld no matter what the consequences. However in reality the issue is not one of curtailing the right to freedom of expression since this is a right that is not absolute and no one can claim so. Rights are reciprocal and their enforcement is interdependent on other fundamental rights. To insist that a right is absolute is erroneous since such a right can infringe other basic human rights.
Every country that claims to be part of the ‘civilized and democratic’ world has put its own limits on freedom of expression in the interests of society in order to maintain a certain level of human behaviour, be it based on local norms and customs, culture or religion but in essence to protect the dignity of their moral and religious, social, and societal values.
So to suddenly create an outcry that the right to freedom of speech is being undermined by Muslim protests is clearly a fallacy. The free propagation of child pornography for instance or the incitements of religious or racial hatred in the media is banned in many countries and quite rightly so. In many European countries it is a crime to deny the Holocaust, being a criminal offence in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Israel, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Switzerland, and is punishable by fines and a jail sentence.
There is also a law of defamation normally under the Law of Tort that can lead to an individual being compensated for offence caused. The absolute right to free expression is curtailed in order to balance the rights of an individual. In the same way an act that causes offence to a whole community can never be justified under the banner of freedom of speech. Moreover in many countries it is illegal or at least discouraged to degrade or abuse the constitution or certain national institutions such as the army, courts of law, or parliament. Contempt of court also exists all over the world which severely limits freedom of speech, violation of which can lead to imprisonment. If the right to freedom of expression is absolute, why are there no objections to laws such as these?
To give respect to an individual’s honour and dignity is a fundamental human right protected by law as is the prohibition on blasphemy and defamation as well as the right to religious freedom. The UN Charter, Constitutions and Laws of many countries provide protection to these rights.
The UN Charter recognises this right in Article 1 (ii): “To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.”
It is also recognised in the European Convention on Human Rights Article 9: “Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”
The Constitution of the USA, Amendment I of Bill of Rights states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Moreover many countries have passed anti-terrorist legislation, severely restricting the civil liberties of individuals, with the legislation drafted in a manner that is clearly aimed at focusing upon Muslims in the countries concerned. There is a strong feeling that a substantial minority is being continually abused and misrepresented in the mass media through the portrayal of negative images not based upon reality, and then subjected to humiliating checks and procedures when going about their lives on a daily basis, all in the name of freedom of speech and national interest. It is thus highly surprising that the sacred elements of its faith are ridiculed just in the name of freedom of expression and speech knowing that the reactions will be extremely tense. There is no doubt that re-publication of these caricatures by the newspapers involved was an exercise to demonstrate control and power directed against Muslims, either subscribe to our culture and way of living or suffer the consequences and be ridiculed and debased.
Realising the significance of this right some world dignitaries have condemned the publication of these caricatures and have emphasised the restriction of the right of the freedom of speech too.
Kofi Annan said: “I also respect the right of freedom of speech. But of course freedom of speech is never absolute. It entails responsibility and judgment.”
The US State Department said: “These cartoons are indeed offensive to the belief of Muslims.” Spokesman, Kurtis Cooper, said: “We all fully respect freedom of the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility. Inciting religious or ethnic hatred in this manner is not acceptable.”
If internationally recognised principles of tolerance and co-existence are put aside and moral and religious values are dishonoured then the present situation will worsen and the prevailing tensions will intensify. Europe considers itself to be an educated and civilized society but its response to the gross infringement of the basic right to religion of one of its minority communities has become un-understandable. There needs to be some mechanism to put an end to these horrific occurrences which may prove a potential threat to world peace. Those who advocate that the right to freedom of speech is being eroded and any restraints upon it cannot be tolerated must look within their own ‘democratic societies’ and the extent to which their civil liberties have been eroded through the recent anti-terrorist legislation.